EU-LDC Themes - Social, Environmental & Welfare aspects of
Trade - Research
|
Corporate
Social Responsibility (CSR) - Background
Publications
Links
Corporate
Social Responsibility (CSR) - Background
Private enterprises are main actors in trade and investment.
Their activities have not only a major economic impact, but also in
social and environmental terms the influence of companies may be
strong. The outcome of corporate behaviour is not always favourable
for the communities that host the activities of companies. Some
enterprises inflict damage on the environment through their
activities, or abuse weak legal frameworks, for example in the case
of child labour. There is a growing consensus that companies should
be held responsible for the effects of their corporate behaviour.
From an economic, social, political and ethical perspective they are
expected to conduct their economic affairs in good faith and in
accordance with proper standards of economic activity, while also
observing fundamental principles of good socio-political and ethical
conduct (UNCTAD,
2001). This idea is conceptualised in the principle of Corporate
Social Responsibility (CSR).
Recently, there has been renwed interest in and research on the
topic of CSR. In 1999 UN Secretary General Kofi Annan proposed the Global
Compact initiative, which aims to make business part of the
solutions to problems of sustainable development. In 2000 the OECD
updated its voluntary Guidelines
for Multinational Enterprises of 1976 . The European Union has
started to promote CSR as well. For example, it initiated the EU
Multi-Stakeholder Forum on CSR (CSR
EMS) in which representatives from business, trade unions and
NGOs participate. Some countries have established awarding systems
for companies which adhere to CSR principles. In other cases they
have established laws through which companies can be held
responsible by their national government for business practices
abroad (foreign direct liability). At the corporate level companies
have started to implement CSR through codes of conducts which aim to
guarantee sound economic, social and environmental behaviour of
individuals and groups within an organisation. There are also joint
initiatives in which private companies co-operate in the
establishment of codes for proper business practices. An example is
the World
Business Council for Sustainable Development which is supported
by 160 international companies.
Research on the issue is conducted in reference to two main
questions. What are the incentives for private business to implement
CSR? And what are the best ways of implementing and enforcing CSR?
Motivations for implementing CSR
Stakeholders
have different motivations for promoting CSR. For governments and
NGOs, CSR can serve as a means to achieve objectives of sustainable
development. For companies there are different reasons to adopt CSR
policies. One of the considerations for implementing CSR is the need
for private businesses to build up and maintain a good reputation
among consumers and employees. This is in particular relevant for
the consumers and employees in developed countries, but also in
developing countries CSR helps to create goodwill among the local
stakeholders in the community which hosts the activities of a
certain company. In addition to the reputation and the brand image
factor, CSR offers possibilities to save costs, for example as a
stimulus for labour productivity or through an efficient use of
materials.
The
benefits of CSR promotion within companies cannot be realised
without incurring costs in the implementation of CSR policies. Some
people argue that the short-term costs of implementation will be
compensated by the long-term benefits. This will contribute to long
run profitability. Others, however, believe, that short-term costs
put constraints on the use of present scarce resources, which in the
end will diminish future profitability. From this perspective,
companies which focus on short run profitability will tend to avoid
the costs of CSR implementation, as they maximise short run profits.
An example are companies which are listed on stock markets; the
stockholders might favour short-term profits over long-term profits.
Companies which seek long-term profits will be more inclined to
adopt CSR provided that they regard the concept as a means for
higher future returns. An example are family-owned ventures. Another
factor for CSR implementation is that small, family-owned companies
are more likely to dependent on a certain community in a developing
country than large, globally operating MNEs.
Ways of CSR implementation and enforcement
As
is shown above, the incentives for companies to implement CSR are
differing and therefore, the existence of the CSR-concept is not a
guarantee that private business abides with demands from
stakeholders for sound corporate behaviour. The question remains how
communities can ensure that companies accept their social,
environmental and ethic responsibilities. Should CSR be enforced
through binding/mandatory principles, or through non-binding
voluntary codes of conduct?
Companies
are generally in favour of keeping guidelines for CSR voluntary.
They argue that this is necessary since circumstances differ among
countries. They believe that mandatory rules at the international or
national level will limit their freedom in coping with these
different circumstances. Contrary to the opinion of business, many
developing countries and NGOs are in favour of binding codes at the
international level, especially when it concerns the activities of
large MNEs. They regard mandatory principle as the only way to
ensure that companies are conducting sound corporate behaviour.
Mandatory principles at the national level will be harmful as it
affects a country’s competitiveness compared to other countries,
which do not apply mandatory principles. Until now, there have been
attempts to set international principles such as the OECD Guidelines
of 1976/2000 and the United Nations Centre for Trans-National
Corporations (UNCTNC) Codes of Conduct for TNCs of 1977, but these
initiatives remain voluntary.
In
developed countries the chances of introducing effective mandatory
rules are more likely. Developed countries have better legal
frameworks and enforcement mechanisms than developing countries.
Still, since this will affect the competitiveness of companies in
developed countries, governments will opt for positive incentives
rather than negative incentives. In cases where there are no legal
means to enforce CSR, there is an important role for NGOs as
watchdogs against improper corporate behaviour.
In
this section you will find information on CSR in business practices.
The documents examine the characteristics of the CSR-concept, the
effectiveness of the instrument and implementation procedures.
Corporate Social Responsibility,
Proceedings of session during the EU-LDC Conference 2002
“Improving global governance for development: issues and
instruments”. For the proceedings click here.
Publications
Corporate
accountability in search of a treaty? Some insights from foreign
direct liability,
Ward, H., 2002, Briefing Paper No. 4, May 2002, Royal Institute of
International Affairs, London
This
paper was written ahead of the World Summit on Sustainable
Development in Johannesburg in 2002. It was intended to serve as
input for the discussion on binding codes of conduct for companies.
The author discusses the issue from a legal perspective. The paper
focuses on two cases of foreign direct liability. It tries to answer
two questions. Should governments in developed countries have
influence on relocation policies of firms to countries with weaker
legal frameworks? Will international binding agreements improve
corporate accountability? The author concludes that no clear answers
to these can be found. Therefore, she suggests that all parties
involved in the discussion on CSR should define their roles in the
process of corporate accountability. A balance is necessary between
the responsibilities of home and host countries. The concept of
foreign direct liability underscores the shared responsibility of
both home and host countries. It offers an opportunity for
co-operation between these two kinds of countries. In addition to
the intergovernmental agenda, support from private companies needs
to be strengthened.
For
the document click here.
Public
Sector Roles in Strengthening Corporate Social Responsibility: A
Baseline Study,
Fox, T., Ward, H., Howard, B., 2002, IIED/World Bank, London/Washington
This
report is prepared for the World Bank CSR Practice Private Sector
Advisory Services Department of the World Bank. It discusses the
roles of public sector agencies in mandating, facilitating,
partnering and endorsing CRS activities. The report draws from
experience in developing countries with CSR policies or policies
containing CSR elements. The authors argue that the challenge for
the public sector is to identify priorities and incentives to
promote/implement CSR, building on existing initiatives and
capacities. Main problems raised in the document are a lack of
capacity in enforcement of minimum standards and other capacity
constraints. As a result, the authors find little evidence that
developing countries’ governments are involved in the definition
and implementation processes of international, voluntary CSR
standards. According to the report there are significant
opportunities for developing countries to engage more in CSR.
For
the document click here.
Regulating
corporate behaviour,
Chatterjee, S., 2002, Briefing Paper No. 4/2002, CUTS Centre for
International Trade, Economics and Environment, Jaipur, India
The
paper gives an overview on the attempts to set codes of conduct for
TNCs in international investment agreements. The author believes
that the success of the attempts has remained limited. However,
these attempts have contributed to the common understanding of the
need for codes of conduct in corporate behaviour. The weakness of
the existing codes of conduct such as the OECD guidelines is the
fact that the guidelines have a voluntary character. In the opinion
of the author, voluntary guidelines are an insufficient means to
ensure sound corporate behaviour, as the guidelines have yet not
been able to prevent recent cases of irresponsible corporate
behaviour. The author believes that binding rules will put more
pressure on companies to monitor the activities of themselves and of
their subsidiaries/partners. An international agreement regulating
corporate behaviour should however also promote clauses on security
and investment opportunities as an incentive for TNCs to co-operate
with the realisation of an international agreement.
For
the document click here.
OECD
Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises – Annual Reports,
OECD, Paris
The
OECD publishes these reports on the occasion of the annual meetings
of the National Contact Points (NCPs) for the MNE-guidelines (link
naar link). The first part of the publications deals with the policy
aspects of the guidelines. The second part contains contributions
from business-, NGO- and trade union representatives. The
contributions are made during a roundtable event which is held
together with the annual meeting:
Annual
Report 2002 – Focus on responsible supply chain management,
OECD, 2002, Paris
The
central theme of the contributions in this report are improvements
in supply chain management. In the summary the roundtable
participants agreed that the solution to responsible supply chain
problems are depending on appropriate frameworks of rules and
regulations, which are still lacking a large number of countries.
The OECD guidelines together with other international agreements
should give companies sufficient benchmarks to formulate their
policies. Among the participants there were different views
concerning the scope of codes of conduct for corporate entities.
For
the document click here.
Annual
Report 2001 – Global instruments for corporate responsibility,
OECD, 2001, Paris
This
report discusses the role of governments in their promotion of the
OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. It also deals with
the complementarity between the Guidelines and other initiatives at
the global level, which are discussed in detail.
For
the document click here.
The
OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises,
OECD, 2001, Policy Brief, June 2001, Paris
This
policy brief describes the background for the adoption of the OECD
Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises in 1976 and their review in
2000. The guidelines are recommendations from governments to
multinational enterprises. They include voluntary codes and
standards for responsible corporate behaviour. The 2000 review aimed
to ensure the relevance of the 1976 guidelines. The brief pays
attention to the implementation of the guidelines. The National
Contact Points of the OECD are important in this process.
For
the document click here.
ERT
position on CSR and response to Commission Green Paper “Promoting
a European Framework for CSR”,
European Round Table of Industrialists (ERT), 2001, Brussels
This
document is a position paper of European business on CSR. The
authors argue that voluntary codes of conduct are more effective
than mandatory rules. They believe that technical, political and
legal obstacles impede a global approach to codes of conduct. They
add that European regulation will be a one-way process and will not
achieve international acceptance. The authors regard the main role
of the EU as a promoter for dialogue between different stakeholders.
For
the document click here.
Social
Responsibility, UNCTAD Series on issues in international investment
agreements,
UNCTAD, 2001, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/22, Geneva
This
publication emphasises the role of social responsibility in
International Investment Agreements (IIAs). It describes the concept
of social responsibility of corporations and gives an overview on
the initiatives within IIAs so far. The document provides an outline
of the possible options on how to deal with CSR in the IIAs. They
range from no inclusion at all to binding principles within IIAs.
For
the document click here.
Links
UN
Global Compact
This
website provides news on the UN Global Compact initiative. The News
and Events section, covers articles, statements and upcoming events
on CSR.
CSR
section of the European Commission, DG Trade ()
This
site links to workshops and forums which have been organised by the
European Commission. During the workshops business and NGO
representatives have presented their ideas. These are covered in the
proceedings of the events. There are also links to policy documents.
EU
Multi-Stakeholder Forum on CSR (CSR EMS)
The
CSR EMS Forum’s site provides information on the meetings of the
forum, which brings together representatives from the EU, employers’
organisations, business networks and NGOs.
CSR
Europe
CSR
Europe is initiated by European businesses. The information on the
site is therefore mainly useful for companies. The site offers an
online CSR Info Centre with recent news items and a link to
publications, one of which, CSR Magazine, is available online.
SME
Key
This
site is an initiative of CSR Europe. If focuses on CSR within Small
and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). It offers information for SMEs
on how to implement CSR practices.
World
Business Council for Sustainable Development
The
site of the WBCSD offers information for businesses on the
implementation of CSR. There are links to other organisations, news
updates and several downloadable documents on sustainable
development from a business perspective.
CorpWatch
On
this site the US based NGO CorpWatch aims to provide information on
corporate behaviour of international companies. It discusses several
issues which are relevant to CSR such as sweatshops, chemical
industries, and effects of trade agreements.
OECD
section on Corporate Responsibility
This
section is linked to documents, news and information on events
organised by the OECD. Most documents are related to the OECD
Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. The site hosts several
working papers which form part of the OECD publication titled
“Corporate Responsibility: Private Initiatives and Public
Goals.”
International
Institute for Sustainable Development’s (IISD) section on CSR
within the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO)
IISD
consults ISO, which has embarked upon a feasibility study for an ISO
CSR standard. On the website there are links to the project, while
the site also contains IISD documents which serve as input for the
feasibility study.
Discussion
forum “CSR – Future leaders’ e-conference” – World Bank
This
site hosts a discussion forum which the World Bank organised from
March to May in 2002. In addition to the discussion itself there is
a background section which includes references and links to relevant
web sites.
International
Institute for Environment and Development’s (IIED) section on
Corporate Responsibility for Environment and Development (CRED)
This
recently launched site contains up-to-date information on the role
of CSR for environment and development. The site contains
information on projects conducted by CRED and several publications
are available on-line.
As a recently launched site, we still have some way to go towards
providing a comprehensive information resource. You can help by
submitting your own contributions (academic papers, position papers,
analysis or comments etc.). To do this, go to Contact
us.
|