EU-LDC Themes - International Capital Markets - Research
|
As
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has assured great significance over
the last decades, the attention for FDI in economic literature has
also increased. The World Bank defines FDI as “investment made to
acquire a lasting management interest in an enterprise operating in
a country other than that of the investor”. FDI can be undertaken
by individuals, but Multinational Corporations (MNCs) account for
the largest share of FDI. The most common used classification for
FDI is outflows and inflows, where inflows are direct investments
undertaken by foreign-based firms or individuals in the host (recipient)
country, and outflows are investments that home based firms or
individuals undertake in foreign countries.
There
are two major fields of studying FDI. One way of studying is looking
at the effects that FDI creates, while the other tries to establish
the reasons or determinants for FDI. Studies on the effects
distinguish between the effects of FDI on capital formation, exports,
employment, technology transfer, economic structure, and the
socio-political climate. Studies on the reasons and determinants of
FDI try to explain why MNCs engage in international production
through FDI rather than carrying out international business through
market transactions such as trade.
Since
the late 1980s more attention is being paid to the possible role of
FDI in economic development, where the focus is on how to maximise
the positive effects of FDI. Most countries today welcome and
actively compete for FDI, and many countries have established
specialised agencies to attract and facilitate inflows of FDI. It
should however be recognised that FDI is a complement to domestic
investment and that sustainable development benefits to host
countries largely depend on the absorptive capacity among the local
enterprise sector in the host country.
FDI
can affect national development in different ways, both positively
and negatively. Systematic evidence is not abundant, and the issue
whether FDI is positive or negative, for developing countries in
particular, is continuously being discussed. Positive effects from
FDI stated are increased financial resources and investment;
enhanced technological capabilities and export competitiveness;
increased employment; strengthening of the skills base; and
protection and improvement of the environment and social conditions.
Other positive effects from FDI are its potential contribution to
international trade integration and access to markets, and a more
competitive business environment, which enhance enterprise
development. Negative effects of FDI often mentioned are the
deterioration of the balance of payments as profits are repatriated;
social disruptions because of accelerated commercialisation in less
developed countries; and increasing dependence on MNCs, which might
jeopardise political sovereignty.
In
this section, a selection of the literature on FDI is presented,
discussing both positive and negative effects of FDI. The main
issues that are subject of research are the following:
These
will be discussed separately.
FDI general effects
This
section reviews some of the publications that give a broad overview
of possible positive and negative effects of FDI on national
development.
FDI:
the current state of play, Anna Soci,
Department of Economics, University of Bologna, November 2002
The
paper is divided in three sections. Section I and II give an
overview of the literature on FDI. Section I briefly reviews the
general theoretical setting from the appearance of the Ownership
Location and Internalisation (OLI) paradigm in the late 70’s to
what has been evolving through the subsequent two decades. Section
II surveys the main effects of FDI on the home and the host
countries respectively. Finally, Section III focuses on the effects
of European economic integration on the activities of multinationals
in the form of FDI.
For
the document click here
Foreign
Direct Investment for Development: Maximising benefits, minimising
costs, OECD
Observer, OECD 2002 Paris
This
report elaborates on maximising the benefits of foreign presence in
the domestic economy. The focus lies on macroeconomic growth and
other welfare-enhancing processes, and the channels through which
these benefits take effect. The report concentrates on four policy
areas:
- FDI
and trade integration;
- FDI
and technology transfers;
- FDI
and competition; and
- FDI
and environmental and social issues.
Policy
analyses are given at the national level, both for home and host
countries, and at the enterprise level.
For
the document click here
New
Horizons for Foreign Direct Investment,
OECD
Global Forum on International Investment, March 2002, Paris
This
in-depth report provides a selection of papers presented at the
opening conference of the OECD’s Global Forum on International
Investment (GFII), held in Mexico City, November 2001. The
conference reaffirmed the importance of FDI flows and emphasized the
importance of linking these to local enterprise development.
Governments need to go beyond traditional liberal FDI policies and
pay more attention to the broad set of regulatory and institutional
frameworks conducive to an enabling environment both for foreign
investment and domestic entrepreneurship. These include the
prevalence of rule of law, more transparent administrative practices,
effectively combating corruption, good corporate governance, sound
competition policy, as well as protection of labor rights and the
environment. At the same time, the need was felt to establish strong
and new partnerships and to contribute to the domestic capacity
building efforts in FDI host countries. These partnerships should
include host and home countries, multinational enterprises,
international organizations, and civil society groups.
For
more information on the conference and papers click here
European
Economy: Responses to the Challenges of Globalisation,
European
Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial, Special
report No 1 / 2002 (p.75-p.87)
The
chapter on FDI in this report is rather general, and focuses on the
current set of multilateral trade rules. It points out that the main
policy challenge concerning FDI will be the negotiation of
multilateral investment rules within the WTO. This should help to
ensure transparency, predictability and non-discrimination for FDI,
thereby supporting higher levels of FDI worldwide.
For
the document click here
Foreign
Direct Investment and Poverty Reduction,
M.Klein, C. Aaron and B.Hadjimichael, World Bank Working Paper 2613
(2001), World Bank.
This
paper poses the question as to whether FDI supports sound
development and, in particular, whether it contributes to poverty
reduction. The paper examines: the main trends in FDI; the role of
FDI as a mechanism to transfer best practices across borders and the
domestic diffusion of best practice; the potential of FDI to improve
the quality of growth through reduced volatility of capital flows
and incomes, improved corporate governance, and better social and
environmental standards; and pre-conditions for beneficial FDI.
According to the authors, FDI is an effective tool to reduce poverty.
The paper further includes an annex of studies relating to FDI,
economic growth, and poverty reduction, detailing the methodology
and main findings of each study.
For
the document click here
How
Beneficial Is Foreign Direct Investment for Developing Countries?,
Prakash Loungani and Assaf Razin, Finance and Development, IMF,
June 2001
Both
economic theory and recent empirical evidence suggest that FDI has a
beneficial impact on developing host countries. However, FDI also
has potential risks, which can reverse or nullify the positive
effects attributed to it. This article elaborates on these potential
risks of FDI. The authors point out that although the empirical
relevance of some of these sources of risk remains to be
demonstrated, the potential risks do appear to make a case for
taking a nuanced view of the likely effects of FDI. The article
concludes by pointing out that developing countries should focus on
improving the investment climate for both domestic and foreign
capital.
For
the document click here
Foreign
Direct Investment Policy and Promotion in Latin America, OECD
Workshop Report, Lima, 15-17 December 1998.
This workshop took place
against the background of the challenges that were posed by the
financial crisis that has hit emerging markets in Asia, but also
elsewhere, including in Latin America. This crisis has made it
imperative for emerging markets to ensure the sustainability of
foreign direct investment inflows. The objective of this workshop
was to identify the policies and promotion methods that are
necessary to achieve this. Two broad themes were addressed at the
workshop:
-
Foreign Direct Investment:
Trends, Assessment and Policies; and
-
Best Practice in
promoting FDI in Latin America.
For
the document click here
|